4.7 Article

Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713350

Keywords

exhaled breath; volatile organic compounds; cancer biomarkers; GC-MS; diagnostics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, and early diagnosis is difficult. In this study, the variability of exhaled breath samples among patients with lung cancer and other types of cancer was investigated. Two classification models were created to separate lung cancer patients from patients with cancer in other locations and to classify different types of cancer. The models showed moderate sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing lung cancer from other types of cancer, but poor accuracy in classifying different types of cancer.
Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, mostly due to diagnostics in the advanced stage. Therefore, the development of a quick, simple, and non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify cancer is essential. However, the creation of a reliable diagnostic tool is possible only in case of selectivity to other diseases, particularly, cancer of other localizations. This paper is devoted to the study of the variability of exhaled breath samples among patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, such as esophageal, breast, colorectal, kidney, stomach, prostate, cervix, and skin. For this, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used. Two classification models were built. The first model separated patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations. The second model classified patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer. Mann-Whitney U tests and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were applied to identify differences in investigated groups. Discriminant analysis (DA), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were applied to create the models. In the case of classifying lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, average sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 69%, respectively. However, the accuracy of classifying groups of patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer was poor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available