4.7 Review

Drug Repositioning for Refractory Benign Tumors of the Central Nervous System

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612997

Keywords

drug repositioning; drug repurposing; schwannoma; meningioma; pituitary neuroendocrine tumor; neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug repositioning is the process of identifying new therapeutic potentials for approved drugs and discovering new therapies for untreated diseases. It can save time and cost compared to de novo drug discovery. This article reviews the utility of drug repositioning for refractory benign tumors of the central nervous system.
Drug repositioning (DR) is the process of identifying novel therapeutic potentials for already-approved drugs and discovering new therapies for untreated diseases. DR can play an important role in optimizing the pre-clinical process of developing novel drugs by saving time and cost compared with the process of de novo drug discovery. Although the number of publications related to DR has rapidly increased, most therapeutic approaches were reported for malignant tumors. Surgical resection represents the definitive treatment for benign tumors of the central nervous system (BTCNS). However, treatment options remain limited for surgery-, chemotherapy- and radiation-refractory BTCNS, as well as malignant tumors. Meningioma, pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), and schwannoma are the most common BTCNS. The treatment strategy using DR may be applied for refractory BTCNS, such as Grade 2 meningiomas, neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis, and PitNETs with cavernous sinus invasion. In the setting of BTCNS, stable disease can provide significant benefit to the patient. DR may provide a longer duration of survival without disease progression for patients with refractory BTCNS. This article reviews the utility of DR for refractory BTCNS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available