4.7 Article

Bioinformatic Analysis of the CXCR2 Ligands in Cancer Processes

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713287

Keywords

chemokine; CXCR2; bioinformatics; pan-cancer analysis; NF-& kappa;B; IL-8; Gro-& alpha;

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a bioinformatic analysis to investigate the role of CXCR2 ligands in 31 different types of cancer. The results showed that the effect of CXCR2 ligands on prognosis depends on the type of cancer and is associated with EMT, angiogenesis, recruiting neutrophils, and the count of M1 macrophages. Each CXCR2 ligand has a unique regulation of expression and may have a different function in cancer processes.
Human CXCR2 has seven ligands, i.e., CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, and CXCL8/IL-8-chemokines with nearly identical properties. However, no available study has compared the contribution of all CXCR2 ligands to cancer progression. That is why, in this study, we conducted a bioinformatic analysis using the GEPIA, UALCAN, and TIMER2.0 databases to investigate the role of CXCR2 ligands in 31 different types of cancer, including glioblastoma, melanoma, and colon, esophageal, gastric, kidney, liver, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. We focused on the differences in the regulation of expression (using the Tfsitescan and miRDB databases) and analyzed mutation types in CXCR2 ligand genes in cancers (using the cBioPortal). The data showed that the effect of CXCR2 ligands on prognosis depends on the type of cancer. CXCR2 ligands were associated with EMT, angiogenesis, recruiting neutrophils to the tumor microenvironment, and the count of M1 macrophages. The regulation of the expression of each CXCR2 ligand was different and, thus, each analyzed chemokine may have a different function in cancer processes. Our findings suggest that each type of cancer has a unique pattern of CXCR2 ligand involvement in cancer progression, with each ligand having a unique regulation of expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available