4.7 Article

Characterization and Comparative Analysis of the Complete Plastomes of Five Epidendrum (Epidendreae, Orchidaceae) Species

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914437

Keywords

Epidendrum; plastid genome; mutational hotspots; phylogenetic analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidendrum, an important genus in the Orchidaceae family, has significant horticultural and ornamental value and serves as a valuable research model. By sequencing and assembling the plastomes of five Epidendrum species, the characteristics and phylogenetic relationships of this genus were explored.
Epidendrum, one of the three largest genera of Orchidaceae, exhibits significant horticultural and ornamental value and serves as an important research model in conservation, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Given the ambiguous identification of germplasm and complex evolutionary relationships within the genus, the complete plastome of this genus (including five species) were firstly sequenced and assembled to explore their characterizations. The plastomes exhibited a typical quadripartite structure. The lengths of the plastomes ranged from 147,902 bp to 150,986 bp, with a GC content of 37.16% to 37.33%. Gene annotation revealed the presence of 78-82 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNAs, and 8 rRNAs. A total of 25-38 long repeats and 130-149 SSRs were detected. Analysis of relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) indicated that leucine (Leu) was the most and cysteine (Cys) was the least. The consistent and robust phylogenetic relationships of Epidendrum and its closely related taxa were established using a total of 43 plastid genomes from the tribe Epidendreae. The genus Epidendrum was supported as a monophyletic group and as a sister to Cattleya. Meanwhile, four mutational hotspots (trnC(GCA)-petN, trnD(GUC)-trnY(GUA), trnS(GCU)-trnG(UCC), and rpl32-trnL(UAG)) were identified for further phylogenetic studies. Our analysis demonstrates the promising utility of plastomes in inferring the phylogenetic relationships of Epidendrum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available