4.7 Article

SFPQ and Its Isoform as Potential Biomarker for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241512500

Keywords

SFPQ; cytoplasmic isoform; metastasis; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); ELISA; IHC; DNA methylation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer markers are measurable molecules produced by tumor cells or immune cells, and they play a crucial role in clinical diagnosis, prognosis, and anti-drug monitoring. SFPQ, a protein, shows significant differences in its expression between normal and cancer cells, and its elevated levels and isoform location could serve as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for lung cancer.
Cancer markers are measurable molecules in the blood or tissue that are produced by tumor cells or immune cells in response to cancer progression. They play an important role in clinical diagnosis, prognosis, and anti-drug monitoring. Although DNA, RNA, and even physical images have been used, proteins continue to be the most common marker. There are currently no specific markers for lung cancer. Metastatic lung cancer, particularly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is one of the most common causes of death. SFPQ, YY1, RTN4, RICTOR, LARP6, and HELLS are expressed at higher levels in cells from NSCLC than in control or cells from inflammatory diseases. SFPQ shows the most difference between the three cell types. Furthermore, the cytoplasmic isoform of SFPQ is only found in advanced cancers. We have developed ELISAs to detect SFPQ and the long and short isoforms. Evidence has shown that the short isoform exists primarily in cancers. Furthermore, immunocytometry studies and IHC analysis have revealed that SFPQ levels are consistent with ELISA results. In addition, enhanced DNA methylation in the SFPQ gene may facilitate the SFPQ expression differences between control and cancer cells. Considering this, elevated SFPQ level and the isoform location could serve as a cancer diagnostic and prognostic marker.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available