Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105210
Keywords
COVID-19 Severity; Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Electronic Health Record; Phenotype
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The widespread use of electronic health records (EHR) based computable phenotypes in clinical research has created new opportunities for data-driven medical applications. However, there is a need for standardized input variables and outcome definitions for better clinical applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies, particularly in developing severity prediction models for COVID-19.
The increasing use of electronic health records (EHR) based computable phenotypes in clinical research is providing new opportunities for development of data-driven medical applications. Adopted widely in the United States and globally, EHRs facilitate systematic collection of patients' longitudinal information, which serves as one of the important foundations for artificial intelligence applications in medicine. Harmonization of input variables and outcome definitions is critically important for wider clinical applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies. In this review, we focused on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity machine learning prediction models and explored the pipeline for standardizing future disease severity model development using EHR information. We identified 2,967 studies published between 01/01/2020 and 02/15/2022 and selected 135 independent studies that had built machine learning prediction models to predict severity related outcomes of COVID-19 patients based on EHR data for the final review. These 135 studies spanning across 27 counties covered a broad range of severity related prediction outcomes. We observed substantial inconsistency in COVID-19 severity phenotype definitions among models in these studies. Moreover, there was a gap between the outcome of these models and clinician-recognized clinical concepts. Accordingly, we recommend that robust clinical input metrics, with outcome definitions which eliminate ambiguity in interpretation, to reduce algorithmic bias, mitigate model brittleness and improve generalizability of a universal model for COVID-19 severity. This framework can potentially be extended to broader clinical application.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available