4.7 Article

Generalized strain energy density-based fatigue indicator parameter

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108427

Keywords

Total strain energy density; Fatigue indicator parameter; Life prediction; Model standardization; Al 7075-T6511 alloy; Puddle iron

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the history of fatigue study, the potential of strain energy density (SED) based approaches were discovered but not widely used in engineering due to the lack of accepted fatigue model and operating instruction. This study provides a normative form of total strain energy density (TSED) based fatigue life equation and a standard flow to determine SED-related material fatigue parameters, aiming to promote its application in engineering. The TSED formula proves to be more effective than the strain-based Coffin-Manson-Basquin equation in correlating fatigue life.
In the history of fatigue study, the potentialities of strain energy density (SED) based approaches were extensively discovered; however, there was limited usage in engineering practice, largely due to the lacking of a widely accepted fatigue model and operating instruction. Accordingly, referring to previous studies, a normative form of total strain energy density (TSED) based fatigue life equation with two power function terms is given, together with a standard flow to determine the corresponding SED-related material fatigue parameters, intending to popularize its application in engineering practice. In particular, the positive elastic and plastic SEDs play the dominant role in high and low cycle fatigue domains, respectively. Strain-controlled fatigue tests of virgin Al 7075-T6511 alloy and an in-service puddle iron are conducted to check the effectiveness of the TSED as the fatigue indicator parameter to correlate fatigue life. Results show that the TSED formula works better than the strain-based Coffin-Manson-Basquin equation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available