4.2 Article

Mechanical characterization and evaluation of pitting corrosion resistance of a superferritic stainless steel model alloy 25Cr-6Mo-5Ni

Journal

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ijmr-2021-8447

Keywords

Pitting corrosion; Polarization test; Stainless steel; Superalloy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of annealed superferritic stainless steel model alloy 25Cr-6Mo-5Ni were studied in 0.6 M NaCl solution. The microstructure exhibited a ferrite matrix and eutectoid phase with a lamellar structure distributed at grain boundaries and within the ferrite grains with a spherical morphology. The model alloy displayed brittle behavior according to tensile and impact results. Fractography analysis revealed the presence of cleavage facets, river patterns, and micro-cracks at grain boundaries and across the ferrite grains. Pitting corrosion initiated within the eutectoid phase containing chrome depletion zones. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements indicated that the breakdown of passive films was more susceptible in the eutectoid phase.
The mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of annealed superferritic stainless steel model alloy 25Cr-6Mo-5Ni were investigated in 0.6 M NaCl solution. The microstructure consisted of a ferrite matrix and eutectoid phase with a lamellar structure distributed at grain boundaries and within the ferrite grains with a spherical morphology. Tensile and impact results suggested brittle behavior of the model alloy. Fractography analysis revealed typical cleavage facets, river patterns and micro-cracks at grain boundaries and across the ferrite grains. Pitting corrosion began within the eutectoid phase, which contains in chrome depletion zones. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements suggest that the breakdown of passive films was more susceptible in the eutectoid phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available