4.7 Article

Epidemiology of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 50-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.392

Keywords

Pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis; Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis; Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) and pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB) in patients with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). A total of 64 studies involving 12,711 patients from 22 countries were included. The pooled proportion of pre-XDR-TB was 26%, while XDR-TB in MDR-TB cases was 9%. These findings highlight the substantial burden of pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB in MDR-TB patients, emphasizing the importance of strengthening TB programs and drug resistance surveillance.
Objectives: To estimate the pooled proportion of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) and pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB) in patients with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB).Methods: We systematically searched articles from electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), ScienceDi-rect, and Google Scholar. We also searched gray literature from the different literature sources main out-come of the review was either XDR-TB or pre-XDR-TB in patients with MDR-TB. We used the random-effects model, considering the substantial heterogeneity among studies. Heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup analyses. STATA version 14 was used for analysis.Results: A total of 64 studies that reported on 12,711 patients with MDR-TB from 22 countries were retrieved. The pooled proportion of pre-XDR-TB was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22-31%), whereas XDR-TB in MDR-TB cases was 9% (95% CI: 7-11%) in patients treated for MDR-TB. The pooled proportion of resistance to fluoroquinolones was 27% (95% CI: 22-33%) and second-line injectable drugs was 11% (95% CI: 9-13%). Whereas the pooled resistance proportions to bedaquiline, clofazimine, delamanid, and line-zolid were 5% (95% CI: 1-8%), 4% (95% CI: 0-10%), 5% (95% CI; 2-8%), and 4% (95% CI: 2-10%), respectively.Conclusion: The burden of pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB in MDR-TB were considerable. The high burdens of pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB in patients treated for MDR-TB suggests the need to strengthen TB programs and drug resistance surveillance.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available