4.6 Article

Thriving in Virtual Academic Conferences: Fact or Fiction?

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2241292

Keywords

Virtual academic conferences; knowledge sharing; knowledge acquisition; thriving; schedule flexibility; location flexibility; motivation-opportunity-ability theoretical framework; >

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drawing on the MOA theoretical framework, this study examines the three-way interaction between unique features of VACs (construal level, schedule and location flexibility, and digital competence) to predict knowledge exchange and attendees' thriving during VACs. Findings reveal that all three elements of the MOA framework are crucial in predicting knowledge exchange in VACs, and both knowledge acquisition and sharing mediate the indirect effects of the three-way interaction on thriving. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, along with directions for future research.
Drawing on the motivation opportunity ability (MOA) theoretical framework, we examine whether there is a three-way interaction between the unique features of virtual academic conferences (VACs), namely construal level (motivation), schedule and location flexibility (opportunity), and digital competence (ability), that predicts knowledge exchange in terms of knowledge sharing and acquisition during VACs, which in turn allows attendees to thrive during VACs. Based on a sample of 166 VAC attendees of two large academic management conferences that were collected pre and post VACs, we found that all three elements of the MOA theoretical framework need to be present to predict knowledge exchange in VACs. Both knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing mediate most of the indirect effect of the three-way interaction concerning thriving. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed as well as future research directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available