4.7 Article

Heat transfer characteristics of thermally and hydrodynamically developing flows in multi-layer mini-channel heat sinks

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124052

Keywords

Developing flow; Heat sink; Mini -channel; Multi-layer; Rectangular channel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel type of air-cooled heat sink with mini-channels is proposed, which has higher heat transfer rates due to its smaller hydraulic diameter compared to conventional heat sinks. An innovative analytical method is used to predict the cooling performance, and numerical simulations are conducted to validate the results. A comparison with a plate-fin heat sink shows that the proposed design has a promising advantage in reducing entropy generation.
In this study, a novel type of air-cooled heat sink is proposed, which consists of several layers of mini-channels. In this design, the hydraulic diameter is smaller than in conventional types of heat sinks, such as plate-fin heat sinks, and consequently, the achievable heat transfer rates are higher. To predict the cooling performance of this heat sink, an innovative analytical method is proposed, results from which are complemented by an extensive number of numerical simulations of the simultaneously developing flows, thermally and hydrodynamically, inside a rectangular channel of the heat sink. The results of the analytical method are compared against two-and three-dimensional simulations and good agreement is found, while from the simulations, correlations are proposed for the Nusselt number in these flows. Finally, the performance of the proposed heat sink is compared to a plate-fin heat sink. This comparison reveals that entropy generation in the latter is around 27% higher than in the former, and suggests a promising advantage of the proposed heat sink design. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available