4.5 Article

Effect of different cooking methods on selected quality criteria and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content of cultivated mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus)

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.16666

Keywords

?PAH4 content; benzo[a]anthracene; cooking; cultivated mushroom; DPPH; IC50; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of different cooking methods on the quality and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contents of cultivated mushrooms was investigated. The study found that cooking methods had significant effects on the dry matter content, cooking loss, and pH value of the mushrooms. Consumption of pan-fried mushrooms with the highest PAH content remained within the regulatory limits.
The effect of different cooking methods (boiling, sous-vide cooking, pan-frying, oven cooking, and barbecuing) on some quality criteria (dry matter content, pH value, cooking loss value, and antioxidant activity) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contents of cultivated mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) was investigated. Different cooking methods were found to have significant effects on the dry matter content, cooking loss, and pH value of the mushroom, whereas no significant effect was observed on the antioxidant activity (IC50). Benzo[a]anthracene (BaA) was detected in both raw and cooked mushroom samples, with no statistically significant difference in n-ary sumation SPAH4 (BaA + Chry + BbF + BaP) content between samples. The n-ary sumation SPAH4 content, initially 0.30 ng/g in raw samples, ranged from 0.34 to 3.50 ng/g across mushrooms cooked using different methods. Importantly, consumption of even 1 kg of pan-fried mushrooms with the highest n-ary sumation SPAH4 content remained within the limits defined by both the Turkish Food Codex Food Contaminants Regulation (TFC 2011) and the European Union Directive (EU 2011).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available