4.7 Article

Investigation of the structure and magnitude of time-varying uncontrolled confounding in simulated cohort data analyzed using g-computation

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Simultaneous adjustment of uncontrolled confounding, selection bias and misclassification in multiple-bias modelling

Paul Brendel et al.

Summary: Traditional multiple-bias adjustment involves adjusting for biases one at a time, while a novel alternative approach is to simultaneously adjust for all biases using imputation and/or regression weighting. A simulation study showed that using correct bias parameters can yield unbiased effect estimates, and even incorrect specification of bias parameters still resulted in less bias compared to observed biased effects. Simultaneous multi-bias analysis is a useful method to investigate and understand how multiple biases can affect initial effect estimates, enhancing the validity and transparency of real-world evidence obtained from observational, longitudinal studies.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

A systematic review of quantitative bias analysis applied to epidemiological research

Julie M. Petersen et al.

Summary: QBA applications in epidemiological research were rare but increasing over time. Most studies used QBA as secondary analyses to conventional methods or to assess the extent of bias. Common types of biases included misclassification, uncontrolled confounders, and selection bias. Many studies did not consider multiple biases or correlations between errors.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Multiple-bias Sensitivity Analysis Using Bounds

Louisa H. Smith et al.

Summary: This study demonstrates a method to bound the total composite bias due to confounding, selection bias, and measurement error, and uses that bound to assess the sensitivity of a risk ratio to any combination of these biases. The approach is conservative and provides a simpler alternative to quantitative bias analysis.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Adjustment for time-dependent unmeasured confounders in marginal structural Cox models using validation sample data

Rebecca M. Burne et al.

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2019)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Causal models adjusting for time-varying confounding-a systematic review of the literature

Philip J. Clare et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

G-computation demonstration in causal mediation analysis

Aolin Wang et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Causal Models and Learning from Data Integrating Causal Modeling and Statistical Estimation

Maya L. Petersen et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Methods for dealing with time-dependent confounding

R. M. Daniel et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2013)

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Invited Commentary: G-Computation-Lost in Translation?

Stijn Vansteelandt et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Implementation of G-Computation on a Simulated Data Set: Demonstration of a Causal Inference Technique

Jonathan M. Snowden et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures

BA Brumback et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology

JM Robins et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2000)