4.5 Article

Estimating cucumber crop coefficients under different greenhouse microclimatic conditions

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 11, Pages 1745-1756

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-023-02535-y

Keywords

Evapotranspiration; Mediterranean region; Priestley-Taylor; Irrigation scheduling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study determines cucumber crop coefficients under different greenhouse microclimatic conditions and parameterizes the Priestley-Taylor reference evapotranspiration model. It is found that there is a significant relationship between crop coefficients and leaf area, and evapotranspiration can be modeled satisfactorily using simple measurements of leaf area index.
This study aimed to determine cucumber crop coefficients under different greenhouse microclimatic conditions, parameterizing the Priestley-Taylor reference evapotranspiration model. Crop evapotranspiration was directly measured with the use of lysimeters, and crop coefficients were computed following the two-step climate FAO 56 methodology. Greenhouse compartments (i.e., cooled or uncooled) showed reference evapotranspiration differences of up to 12% in an autumn-winter crop. The results presented cucumber crop coefficient values from the initial to the late-season growth stages from 0.45 to 0.94 depending on the greenhouse climate. Based on the greenhouse hourly microclimatic variation of KC, it is recommended not to apply a KC as a constant for transpiration estimation even at greenhouses located within the same region Regression analysis relating crop coefficients with leaf area revealed very high correlation coefficients for the equations tested. The results indicated that evapotranspiration can be modeled satisfactory based on a significant relationship between crop coefficient and simple measurements of the leaf area index (i.e., KC = 0.447 x LAI).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available