4.7 Article

Effective reinforcement of plasticized starch by the incorporation of graphene, graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126130

Keywords

Plasticized starch; Graphene oxide; Electrical response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasticized starch nanocomposite films with graphene and graphene oxide were prepared using a casting method. The addition of graphene resulted in improved mechanical properties, while Salvia extracts acted as a co-plasticizer. The inclusion of graphene oxide showed strong interactions with starch and improved electrical conductivity compared to graphene.
Plasticized starch (PLS) nanocomposite films using glycerol and reinforced with graphene (G) and graphene oxide (GO) were prepared by solvent casting procedure. On one hand, the influence of adding different G contents into the PLS matrix was analyzed. In order to improve the stability of G nanoflakes in water, Salvia extracts were added as surfactants. The resulting nanocomposites presented improved mechanical properties. A maximum increase of 287 % in Young's modulus and 57 % in tensile strength was achieved for nanocomposites with 5 wt% of G. However, it seemed that Salvia acted as co-plasticizer for the PLS. Moreover, the addition of the highest G content led to an improvement of the electrical conductivity close to 5 x 10-6 S/m compared to the matrix. On the other hand, GO was also incorporated as nanofiller to prepare nanocomposites. Thus, the effect of increasing the GO content in the final behavior of the PLS nanocomposites was evaluated. The characterization of GO containing PLS nanocomposites showed that strong starch/GO interactions and a good dispersion of the nanofiller were achieved. Moreover, the acidic treatment applied for the reduction of the GO was found to be effective, since the electrical conductivity was 150 times bigger than its G containing counterpart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available