4.7 Article

First crystal structure of an NADP(+)-dependent L-arginine dehydrogenase belonging to the mu-crystallin family

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126070

Keywords

L-Arginine dehydrogenase; mu-Crystallin/ornithine cyclodeaminase family; Crystal structure; Amino acid dehydrogenase; Site-directed mutagenesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal structures of Pseudomonas veronii L-arginine dehydrogenase in complex with different substrates were studied. The enzyme showed similarities with Archaeoglobus fulgidus L-AlaDH in terms of structure and specificity, but had different residues recognizing the substrates' amino groups.
Crystal structures of Pseudomonas veronii L-arginine dehydrogenase (L-ArgDH), belonging to the mu-crystallin/ ornithine cyclodeaminase family, were determined for the enzyme in complex with L-lysine and NADP(+) and with L-arginine and NADPH. The main chain coordinates of the P. veronii L-ArgDH monomer showed notable similarity to those of Archaeoglobus fulgidus L-AlaDH, belonging to the same family, and pro-R specificity similar to L-AlaDH for hydride transfer to NADP(+) was postulated. However, the residues recognizing the a-amino group of the substrates differed between the two enzymes. Based on a substrate modeling study, it was proposed that in A. fulgidus L-AlaDH, the amino group of L-alanine interacts via a water molecule (W510) with the side chains of Lys41 and Arg52. By contrast, the alpha-amino group of L-arginine formed hydrogen bonds with the side chains of Thr224 and Asn225 in P. veronii L-ArgDH. Moreover, the guanidino group of L-arginine was fixed into the active site via hydrogen bonds with the side chain of Asp54. Site-directed mutagenesis suggested that Asp54 plays an important role in maintaining high reactivity against the substrate and that Tyr58 and Lys71 play critical roles in enzyme catalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available