4.1 Article

Iron reduction as a viable metabolic pathway in Enceladus' ocean

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASTROBIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 539-558

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1473550423000125

Keywords

Enceladus; iron reduction; magnetite; metabolism; pH; temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have explored the metabolic pathways in Enceladus' ocean, suggesting the existence of methane generation driven by hydrothermal activity. This study investigates whether microbial iron reduction could occur in the ocean, and demonstrates the possibility of biogeochemical iron cycling in Enceladus' ocean.
Recent studies postulated the viability of a suite of metabolic pathways in Enceladus' ocean motivated by the detection of H2 and CO2 in the plumes - evidence for available free energy for methanogenesis driven by hydrothermal activity at the moon's seafloor. However, these have not yet been explored in detail. Here, a range of experiments were performed to investigate whether microbial iron reduction could be a viable metabolic pathway in the ocean by iron-reducing bacteria such as Geobacter sulfurreducens. This study has three main outcomes: (i) the successful reduction of a number of crystalline Fe(III)-bearing minerals predicted to be present at Enceladus was shown to take place to differing extents using acetate as an electron donor; (ii) substantial bacterial growth in a simulated Enceladus ocean medium was demonstrated using acetate and H2(g) separately as electron donors; (iii) microbial iron reduction of ferrihydrite was shown to partially occur at pH 9, the currently accepted value for Enceladus' ocean, whilst being severely hindered at the ambient ocean temperature of 0 & DEG;. This study proposes the possibilities for biogeochemical iron cycling in Enceladus' ocean, suggesting that a strain of iron-reducing bacteria can effectively function under Enceladus-like conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available