CEFTO-CURE study: CEFTObiprole Clinical Use in Real-lifE-a multi-centre experience in Italy

Background: Ceftobiprole is approved in Europe for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in adults. Real-world data are limited.Methods: This multi-centre, observational, ambispective investigator-initiated study was undertaken in Italy from January 2018 to December 2019 in order to evaluate the use of ceftobiprole in a real-world setting.Results: Overall, 195 patients from 10 centres were evaluated (68% retrospectively). Male sex was preva-lent ( n = 121, 62%). Median age was 67 [interquartile range (IQR) 53-75] years. Median Charlson Comor-bidity Index score was 5 (IQR 3-7). The most common indication was pneumonia (151/195, 77%), espe-cially HAP. Other uses were skin and soft tissue infections (5%), endocarditis (4%) and bone infections (4%). Ceftobiprole was usually an empiric choice (65%), in combination with other drugs (66%) and as second-line therapy (58%). A causative agent was found in 39% of cases. A diagnosis of sepsis was made in 59 cases (30%). Success in the clinically evaluable population (excluding 12 cases due to isolation of pathogens outside ceftobiprole's spectrum of activity) was obtained in 79% of cases, with all-cause mor-tality of 20%. On multi-level analysis, three predictors were positively associated with clinical success: male gender, pneumonia and detection of causal agent. Sepsis was a negative predictor. Nine factors were independently associated, favourably or unfavourably, with fatal outcome. Conclusions: Ceftobiprole is a safe and effective therapeutic choice, even in a real-world setting. More data are needed to establish its efficacy in patients with sepsis.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Automated summary

This study evaluated the use of Ceftobiprole in a real-world setting and found it to be a safe and effective therapeutic choice, particularly for pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. The study also identified factors associated with treatment success or fatal outcomes.