4.7 Article

Determination of dopamine using a glassy carbon electrode modified with a graphene and carbon nanotube hybrid decorated with molybdenum disulfide flowers

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 183, Issue 7, Pages 2267-2275

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-016-1864-x

Keywords

Parkinson disease; Nanomaterials; Nanocomposite; Carbon nanostructures; Metal dichalcogenide nanosheets; Cyclic voltammetry; Differential pulse voltammetry; Scanning electron microscopy, rat brain analysis; Serumanalysis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [NSC 103-2811-M-027-002, 102-2113-M-027-002-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a hybrid material that consists of molybdenum sulfide flowers placed on graphene nanosheets and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (GNS-CNTs/MoS2). It was deposited on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) which then is well suited for sensitive and selective determination of dopamine. The GNS-CNTs/MoS2 nanocomposite was prepared by a hydrothermal method and characterized by scanning electron and transmission emission microscopies, energydispersive X-ray spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, differential pulse voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochemical studies show the composite to possess excellent electrochemical properties such as a large electrochemically active surface, high capacitance current, a wide potential window, high conductivity and large porosity. The electrode displays excellent electrocatalytic ability to oxidize dopamine. The modified GCE, best operated at a working potential as low as 0.15 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), responds linearly to dopamine in the 100 nM to 100 mu M concentration range. The detection limit is 50 nM, and the sensitivity is 10.81 (+/- 0.26) mu A.mu M-1.cm(-2). The sensor has good selectivity, appreciable stability, repeatability and reproducibility. It was applied to the determination of dopamine in (spiked) biological and pharmaceutical samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available