4.6 Article

Effects of process parameters on properties of friction stir additive manufactured copper

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 11-12, Pages 5651-5664

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-023-11931-y

Keywords

Friction stir additive manufacturing; Process parameters; Copper; Mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the impact of friction stir additive manufacturing (FSAM) process parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of copper. Variables such as plunge depth, tilt angle, and rotational and traverse velocities of the FSAM tool are analyzed. The study reveals that improper process parameters can lead to incomplete deposition in FSAM of copper. The formation of an ultra-fine grained zone called the re-stirring area is observed in the center of the print. The highest strength printed sample is achieved at specific parameters.
This article investigated the effects of friction stir additive manufacturing (FSAM) process parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of copper. The FSAM tool plunge depth, tilt angle, and rotational and traverse velocities are considered as variables. Material flow, internal defects, hardness, and mechanical properties are analyzed on FSAM samples. The results show that the FSAM of copper is very sensitive to process parameters, and incomplete deposition can happen during FASM with inappropriate process parameters. The microstructure of the printed layer tolerates a thermo-mechanical cycle during the process and reheating after depositing new layers. In the center of the print, an ultra-fine grained zone formed called the re-stirring area. The highest strength printed sample achieved at 3 degrees degree tool tilt, 0.25-mm plunge depth, 2000-rpm rotation, and 16-mm/min traverse speed that has similar to 85-HV hardness and 205-MPa tensile strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available