4.7 Review

Personality-assisted mood modeling with historical reviews for sentiment classification

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 649, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.119645

Keywords

Sentiment classification; Mood; Personality; Historical reviews

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research proposes a Personality-Assisted Mood for Sentiment Classification (PAMSC) model that takes into account user mood for sentiment expression classification. The experimental results demonstrate that the PAMSC model achieves higher accuracy and interpretability compared to related models.
Review sentiment classification aims to predict user sentiment for given user-generated review. Most of the existing methods enhance their sentiment classifiers by incorporating user information. However, those methods normally ignore user's mood, which could influence her/his sentiment expression. Actually, users in a certain mood tend to express mood-congruent sentiment. Furthermore, the related studies may not fully utilize user's personality to model her/his mood. In this paper, we are motivated to propose a Personality-Assisted Mood for Sentiment Classification (PAMSC) model to classify user sentiment. Concretely, we first adopt the target review with global user preference to prejudge user sentiment. Meanwhile, we model the personalized mood impact on her/his sentiment expression according to the corresponding historical reviews. We finally obtain the prediction result by utilizing the personalized mood impact to adjust the prejudged sentiment distribution. Particularly, personality plays two major roles in the process of mood modeling. One is to analyze the personalized duration of user's mood, and the other is to model the personalized attention toward mood-congruent information. The experimental results demonstrate that our PAMSC model not only achieves the highest classification accuracy than the related models on three real-world datasets but also has stronger interpretability for the prediction process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available