4.7 Article

Elastic net twin support vector machine and its safe screening rules

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 635, Issue -, Pages 99-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.131

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a new classifier called elastic net twin support vector machine (ETSVM) is introduced to enhance classification performance. ETSVM resolves two smaller-sized quadratic programming problems (QPPs) similar to twin support vector machine (TSVM), but with the use of elastic net penalty for slack variables. The key difference is that ETSVM does not involve matrix inversion, avoiding ill-conditioning cases. Theoretical properties are discussed and safe screening rules (SSR-ETSVM) are derived to increase computing efficiency. Comparison with other methods confirms the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.
In this paper, we present a new classifier called elastic net twin support vector machine (ETSVM). It resolves two smaller-sized quadratic programming problems (QPPs) similarly to the twin support vector machine (TSVM). The key difference between them is that ETSVM uses elastic net penalty for slack variables, which enhances classification performance. The dual QPPs of the ETSVM do not involve matrix inversion, in contrast to conventional TSVM. As a result, ETSVM can avoid the ill-conditioning case. We theoretically discuss its properties, including exploring the violation tolerance upper bound for the two QPPs of ETSVM. In order to increase computing efficiency, we derive a sequence of safe screening rules using variational inequalities to quicken the ETSVM parameter tuning process (SSR-ETSVM). We compare the proposed algorithm with SVM, nonparallel hyperplane SVM, elastic net SVM, and elastic net nonparallel hyperplane SVM. Numerical experiments confirm the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available