4.2 Article

Cyclic AMP signaling enhances lipopolysaccharide sensitivity and interleukin-33 production in RAW264.7 macrophages

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 382-389

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1348-0421.12381

Keywords

cyclic AMP; interleukin-33; lipopolysaccharide; macrophages

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K07938]
  2. Research Institute of Personalized Health Sciences, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K07938] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While it has been suggested that IL-33 plays pathogenic roles in various disorders, the factors that stimulate IL-33 production are poorly characterized. In the present study, the effect of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling on IL-33 production in RAW264.7 macrophages in response to various doses of LPS was examined. High-dose LPS treatment induced IL-33 and TNF protein production in RAW264.7 macrophages. In contrast, low-dose LPS failed to induce IL-33 production while significantly inducing TNF production. In the presence of the membrane-permeable cAMP analog 8-Br-cAMP, low-dose LPS induced vigorous IL-33 production. This phenomenon was consistent with amounts of mRNA. Similarly, the cAMP-increasing agent adrenaline also enhanced the sensitivity of RAW264.7 macrophages to LPS as demonstrated by IL-33 production. The protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H89 blocked the effects of 8-Br-cAMP and adrenaline on IL-33 production, suggesting that PKA is involved in IL-33 induction. Taken together, cAMP-mediated signaling pathway appears to enhance the sensitivity of RAW264.7 macrophages to LPS with respect to IL-33 production. Our findings suggest that stress events and the subsequent secretion of adrenaline enhance macrophage production via IL-33; this process may be associated with the pathogenesis of various disorders involving IL-33.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available