4.7 Article

Binary blends of Eucommia ulmoides gum and Nitrile butadiene rubber based on Materials Studio: Compatibility prediction, preparation and properties characterization

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117255

Keywords

Binary blends; Compatibility simulation; Eucommia ulmoides gum; Blending and vulcanization experiments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the compatibility of Eucommia ulmoides gum (EUG) and Nitrile butadiene (NBR) was simulated using Materials Studio (MS) software. The results showed that they had good blending prospect at 398 K when the EUG content was less than 50 phr. The optimal blending and vulcanization process was determined to be conducted at 363 K for 30 min during blending and vulcanized at 423 K for 50 min at a component ratio of 20/80. The vulcanized binary blends of EUG and NBR exhibited excellent anti-aging properties, mechanical properties, wear resistance, hydrophobicity, etc., compared with NBR.
In this work, compatibility of Eucommia ulmoides gum (EUG) and Nitrile butadiene (NBR) were simulated with the guidance of Materials Studio (MS) software. The results illustrated that when the EUG content was less than 50 phr, they have good blending prospect at 398 K. Then, blending and vulcanization experiments were carried out to get the optimal blending and vulcanization process of EUG and NBR, showing that the blending process should be under 363 K for 30 min and the best-vulcanized process was vulcanized at 423 K for 50 min at component 20/80. A series of characterization results of the vulcanized binary blends of EUG and NBR indicated that they had more excellent anti-aging properties, mechanical properties, wear resistance, hydrophobicity, etc., compared with NBR. It is worth mentioning that molecular simulation, as a theoretical method, may contribute to our understanding of the structure-properties relationship for EUG/NBR blends.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available