4.5 Review

Serum VacA antibody is associated with risks of peptic ulcer and gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Journal

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 220-228

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.08.030

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; vacA; Peptic ulcer disease; Gastric cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Increasing studies have investigated the relationship between the status of H. pylori vacA antibody and risks of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastric cancer (GC). However, the results were controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to clarify whether serum vacA antibody is associated with risks of PUD and GC. Methods:. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of knowledge, Wanfang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), OVID, Karger and Scopus were systematically searched for potentially eligible literature. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were adopted to assess the strength of association. Results: Serum VacA antibody was associated with increased risk of PUD compared with gastritis/functional dyspepsia (FD) (OR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.56-2.46, P < 0.001). Serum VacA antibody was significantly associated with increased risk of gastric ulcer (GU) and duodenal ulcer (DU) compared with gastritis/FD (GU: OR = 1.64, 95%CI = 1.02-2.62, P = 0.042; DU: OR = 2.06, 95%CI = 1.50-2.84, P < 0.001, respectively). Significant increased risk of GC was found in serum VacA antibody positive subjects compared with serum VacA antibody negative individuals (OR = 2.78, 95%CI = 1.98-3.89, P < 0.001). There was no significant publication bias in all of the comparisons. Conclusions: Serum VacA antibody was significantly associated with increased risks of peptic ulcer disease, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer compared with gastritis and functional dyspepsia controls. Significant association was also found between serum VacA antibody and gastric cancer risk. Serum VacA antibody might be a potential biomarker for the prediction of risks of PUD and GC. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available