4.8 Article

Variable Sampling Frequency-Based SM Power Loss Balancing Control for MMCs With Bypassed Faulty SMs

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 9006-9018

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3267498

Keywords

Modular multilevel converter (MMC); power loss balancing; submodule (SM) bypass; variable sampling frequency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a variable sampling frequency-based power loss balancing control (VSF-PLBC) for the modular multilevel converter (MMC). The VSF-PLBC adjusts the sampling frequency based on the number of faulty submodules (SMs) to balance power loss distribution among the arms of MMCs. The simulation and experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed VSF-PLBC in improving the reliability of the MMC.
The modular multilevel converter (MMC) is one of the most appropriate topologies for high-power applications due to its high modularity and low harmonic distortion. As faulty submodules (SMs) are bypassed, the capacitor voltage and switching frequency of healthy SMs in the faulty arm will rise, which causes unbalanced power loss distribution among the arms of MMCs and affects the reliability of MMCs. This article proposes a variable sampling frequency-based power loss balancing control (VSF-PLBC), which can balance power loss distribution among the arms of MMCs through adjusting the sampling frequency for an arm inserted SM number to modify switching losses in power devices in the MMC with bypassed SMs. The proposed VSF-PLBC can effectively improve the reliability of theMMCwith the balanced power loss distribution among the arms in the MMC with bypassed SMs. The proposed VSF-PLBC is simulated with the professional tool PSCAD/EMTDC and is validated on a down-scale MMCprototype. The simulation and experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed VSF-PLBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available