4.7 Article

CROWDFL: Privacy-Preserving Mobile Crowdsensing System Via Federated Learning

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 4607-4619

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2022.3157603

Keywords

Crowdsensing; federated learning; homomorphic encryption; incentive; privacy protection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a privacy-preserving mobile crowdsensing system called CROWDFL is proposed by integrating federated learning (FL) into MCS. Participants in CROWDFL locally process sensing data and only upload encrypted training models to the server to protect their privacy. The system also includes a secure aggregation algorithm and a hybrid incentive mechanism to improve efficiency and stimulate participation.
As an emerging sensing data collection paradigm, mobile crowdsensing (MCS) enjoys good scalability and low deployment cost but raises privacy concerns. In this paper, we propose a privacy-preserving MCS system called CROWDFL by seamlessly integrating federated learning (FL) into MCS. At a high level, in order to protect participants' privacy and fully explore participants' computing power, participants in CROWDFL locally process sensing data via FL paradigm and only upload encrypted training models to the server. To this end, we design a secure aggregation algorithm (SecAgg) through the threshold Paillier cryptosystem to aggregate training models in an encrypted form. Also, to stimulate participation, we present a hybrid incentive mechanism combining the reverse Vickrey auction and posted pricing mechanism, which is proved to be truthful and fail. Results of theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation on a practical MCS scenario (human activity recognition) show that CROWDFL is effective in protecting participants' privacy and is efficient in operations. In contrast to existing solutions, CROWDFL is 3x faster in model decryption and improves an order of magnitude in model aggregation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available