4.8 Article

Vision-Based Hierarchical Impedance Control of an Aerial Manipulator

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 70, Issue 7, Pages 7014-7022

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3203755

Keywords

Task analysis; Manipulators; Impedance; Cameras; Visual servoing; Aerospace electronics; Aerodynamics; Aerial manipulation; hierarchical control; image-based visual servoing (IBVS); impedance control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes an image-based impedance control scheme for an under-actuated aerial manipulator. It introduces a dynamic-level image-space visual servoing controller to achieve compliant interaction with unknown environments without requiring feedback of external wrench and Cartesian position. The article also presents a decoupled attitude tracking control task to address the under-actuation property of the system. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
This article presents an image-based impedance control scheme for an under-actuated aerial manipulator. Unlike the existing Cartesian cascade control (admittance control) scheme, we design an image-space visual servoing controller at the dynamic level to achieve compliant interaction with unknown environments. Furthermore, compared with the state of the art in aerial interaction control, feedback of both the external wrench and the Cartesian position of the aerial manipulator are not required. To cope with the under-actuation property of the system, an attitude tracking control task is designed in such a way that it is dynamically decoupled with the visual impedance control task. Convergence of the task-space tracking error is proven based on the Lyapunov theory. The finite-gain L-2 stability of the system regarding external force/disturbance is also proven. Indoor experiments are conducted to demonstrate the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available