4.8 Article

Social Trust-Driven Consensus Reaching Model for Multiattribute Group Decision Making: Exploring Social Trust Network Completeness

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 3040-3054

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2023.3241145

Keywords

Decision making; Reliability; Costs; Social networking (online); Psychology; Optimization; Numerical models; Completeness; consensus-reaching process (CRP); minimum adjustment; multiattribute group decision-making (MAGDM); social trust network (STN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the development of social media, social networks have become an important platform for information exchange. This article presents a consensus decision framework for multiattribute group decision making based on the social trust network. By considering trust propagation and aggregation processes, consensus is achieved. Numerical examples and simulation experiments are used to demonstrate the applicability and superiority of these methods.
With the development of social media, social networks (SNs) have gradually become the link of information exchange between people. The social trust network (STN), a typical SN, is considered the basis of interaction for experts. Therefore, in the STN environment, an STN-driven consensus decision framework of multiattribute group decision making is developed. First, a two-stage analysis method of STN completeness considering the social psychology of experts is proposed to obtain a complete STN, which includes the processes of trust propagation and aggregation. Second, based on the complete modified STN, an STN-driven consensus-reaching process is presented with a consensus optimization model aiming at minimum adjustments. In addition, a numerical example is used to further elaborate on the applicability of these methods. Finally, a series of simulation experiments are designed to objectively determine the parameters in the proposed methods and highlight the rationality and superiority of the proposed methods by comparisons and discussions with related studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available