4.6 Article

Development of Theoretical Model for Effective Carrier Lifetime in Polycrystalline Semiconductors

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2023.3300654

Keywords

Computational modeling; Charge carrier lifetime; Radiative recombination; Semiconductor device modeling; Electron traps; Photonic band gap; Flowcharts; Grain boundary (GB)-orientation; minority carrier lifetime; polycrystalline (pc) semiconductors; theoretical model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel theoretical model has been developed to investigate the effective minority carrier lifetime (EMCL) for polycrystalline (pc) semiconductor-based devices by analyzing their grain boundary (GB) image. The model takes into account Gaussian-distributed traps with unequal electron and hole capture cross sections. The whole GB image is divided into multiple small cells to develop the model. The accuracy of the model improves by reducing the cell size (d), but at the cost of increased computational time.
The effective minority carrier lifetime (EMCL) is one of the critical parameters used to determine the performance of polycrystalline (pc) semiconductor-based electronic and photosensitive devices. A novel theoretical model has been developed to investigate the EMCL for pc-semiconductors from their grain boundary (GB) image. The model considers Gaussian-distributed donor-and acceptor-like traps with an unequal capture cross section of electrons and holes. The whole GB image is considered to be composed of multiple small cells for developing the model. The EMCL of some pc-semiconductors has been computed from their reported GB images. The developed model is validated by comparing the obtained EMCLs with their reported experimental values. It has been observed that reducing the cell size (d) improves the accuracy of the model, however, at the cost of increased computational time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available