4.7 Article

Quantized Consensus Under Data-Rate Constraints and DoS Attacks: A Zooming-In and Holding Approach

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Volume 68, Issue 9, Pages 5397-5412

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2022.3223277

Keywords

Data rate; denial-of-service (DoS) attacks; multiagent systems; quantized consensus; uncertain non-linear systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article addresses the problem of quantized consensus for uncertain nonlinear multiagent systems under data-rate constraints and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. A novel dynamic quantization method with zooming-in and holding capabilities is proposed to mitigate the effects of DoS attacks. The developed control protocol is shown to handle any DoS attacks inducing bounded consecutive packet losses with only three-level quantization, as demonstrated through experiments.
This article is concerned with the quantized consensus problem for uncertain nonlinear multiagent systems under data-rate constraints and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. The agents are modeled in strict-feedback form with unknown nonlinear dynamics and external disturbance. Extended state observers (ESOs) are leveraged to estimate agents' total uncertainties along with their states. To mitigate the effects of DoS attacks, a novel dynamic quantization with zooming-in and holding capabilities is proposed. The idea is to zoom-in and hold the variable to be quantized if the system is in the absence and presence of DoS attacks, respectively. The control protocol is given in terms of the outputs of the ESOs and the dynamic-quantization-based encoders and decoders. We show that, for a connected undirected network, the developed control protocol is capable of handling any DoS attacks inducing bounded consecutive packet losses with merely three-level quantization. The application of the zooming-in and holding approach to known linear multiagent systems is also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available