4.4 Article

Optimal Design of a Compound Magnetic Shielding Based on Fe-Based Nanocrystalline Alloy

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2023.3245051

Keywords

Coils; Magnetic fields; Analytical models; Magnetic shielding; Metals; Harmonic analysis; Magnetic flux; Critical current; Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy; high-temperature-superconducting machine; magnetic shielding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new compound magnetic shielding (CMS) is proposed to reduce the impact of rich harmonics and non-negligible amplitude magnetic field on the critical current Ic of HTS-excitation coil in the analyzed DS-HTSM. The CMS consists of a copper shield layer and a combined flux diverters (FDs) including the silicon steel sheet (SSS) FD and the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy (FNA) FD. The results show that the critical current Ic of HTS-excitation coil in the analyzed DS-HTSM can be improved by 36% after using the proposed CMS.
The magnetic field inside the analyzed double-stator high-temperature-superconducting machine (DS-HTSM) has the characteristics of rich harmonics and non-negligible amplitude, which will seriously reduce the critical current I-c of HTS-excitation coil. Therefore, a new compound magnetic shielding (CMS) is proposed in this paper, which is composed of a copper shield layer and a combined flux diverters (FDs) including the silicon steel sheet (SSS) FD and the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy (FNA) FD. The key is that the iron loss of SSS FD located in the inner Dewar can be reduced due to the flux pre-diversion of the FNA FD on the outside. In addition, the FEA model based on the T-A formula for HTS-excitation coil is built, based on which the optimal design of proposed CMS is conducted. The results show that the critical current I-c of HTS-excitation coil in the analyzed DS-HTSM can be improved by 36% after using the proposed CMS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available