4.7 Article

Subtransfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition: Boosting the Outlier User Accuracy

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages 25005-25015

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3312146

Keywords

Data augmentation; deep learning; human activity recognition (HAR); subject-specific learning; subtransfer learning; unsupervised feature learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human activity recognition (HAR) is an active area of sensory healthcare research that has the potential to improve the quality of life for patients and the public. This study investigates the impact of outlier users on activity recognition and proposes a novel approach called subtransfer learning to improve accuracy on challenging datasets with diverse users and sensor locations.
Human activity recognition (HAR) has become one of the most active areas of sensory healthcare research due to its potential to improve the quality of life both for patients in healthcare settings who are susceptible to falls or undergo physical therapy and the public to promote a more active lifestyle. The state-of-the-art machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms analyze sensory data from multiple users to achieve unprecedented performance in recognizing daily activities. Most research focuses on the average performance across the population of users however, it is evident that the performance distribution across different users is anything but uniform. In fact, the outlier users demonstrate performance degradations of up to 30% compared to median accuracy on any given dataset. This study investigates the impact of outlier users on activity recognition and proposes a novel approach called subtransfer learning to demonstrate that transfer learning principles can be applied within the same dataset when coupled with augmentation techniques. Our results show that subtransfer learning outperforms the source model (SM) on four datasets with different age groups and sensor placements, even when using a few additional samples. Specifically, in the most challenging dataset, the proposed approach outperforms the SM accuracy on low-accuracy subjects (80% compared to 60%) and median-accuracy subjects (98% compared to 91%) while maintaining the same levels for high-accuracy subjects. A statistical significance test further demonstrates performance improvements compared to both source and subject-specific models with p-values 0.009 and 0.0005, respectively, across a range of dataset with demographically diverse users and sensor locations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available