4.7 Article

Intensity-Modulated Fiber-Optic Salinity Sensor by Tapered Microcavity MachZehnder Interferometer

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 19, Pages 22517-22523

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3304381

Keywords

Optical fiber sensors; Sensors; Salinity (geophysical); Sensitivity; Claddings; Optical fiber polarization; Optical fiber couplers; Fiber-optic sensor; intensity modulation; microcavity; salinity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a fiber-optic microcavity Mach-Zehnder interferometer based on the tapered multimode-hollow-core-multimode fiber structure is proposed and experimentally demonstrated for high-precision salinity sensing. The sensor shows obvious intensity modulation with the varied refractive index of liquid, achieving a high sensitivity of 796 dB/RIU and a salinity sensitivity of 0.154 dB/%(o) in the range from 0%(o) to 11%(o). Additionally, the sensor has low-temperature crosstalk and high stability, with a real limit of detection within 0.1%(o).
In this article, a fiber-optic microcavity MachZehnder interferometer is proposed and experimentally demonstrated for high-precision salinity sensing, based on the tapered multimode-hollow-core-multimode fiber structure. The excited evanescent wave field distribution is analyzed, and the quantitative relation is proved between the light intensity and taper ratio. The comprehensive tests are then performed and the experimental results show that the proposed sensor has obvious intensity modulation with the varied RI of liquid. The sensitivity as high as 796 dB/RIU is gained by the structure with the taper ratio of similar to 0.22, and the corresponding salinity sensitivity reaches 0.154 dB/%(o) in the range from 0%(o) to 11%(o). Besides, due to low-temperature crosstalk and high stability, the real limit of detection of our sensor is constrained within 0.1%(o).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available