4.7 Article

Digital Twin for Networking: A Data-Driven Performance Modeling Perspective

Journal

IEEE NETWORK
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 202-209

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/MNET.119.2200080

Keywords

Data models; Performance evaluation; Solid modeling; Topology; Network topology; Optimization; Digital twins

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The digital twin network (DTN) is a technology that can alleviate network burdens by virtually enabling users to understand how performance changes with modifications. This study compares several data-driven methods and explores their trends in data, models, and applications. The survey finds that performance models have been widely applied, but there are still challenges in handling diversified inputs and limited data.
Emerging technologies and applications make the network unprecedentedly complex and heterogeneous, leading the network operations to be costly and risky. The digital twin network (DTN) can ease these burdens by virtually enabling users to understand how performance changes accordingly with modifications. For this What-if performance evaluation, conventional simulation and analytical approaches are inefficient, inaccurate, and inflexible, and we argue that data-driven methods are most promising. In this article, we identify three requirements ( fidelity, efficiency, and flexibility) for performance evaluation. Then we present a comparison of selected data- driven methods and investigate their potential trends in data, models, and applications. We find that performance models have enabled extensive applications, while there are still significant conflicts between models' capacities to handle diversified inputs and limited data collected from the production network. We further illustrate the opportunities for data collection, model construction, and application prospects. This survey aims to provide a reference for performance evaluation while also facilitating future DTN research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available