4.5 Article

Revealing regolith substructure by Chang'E-5 LRPR with optimized cable calibration method

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 402, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115630

Keywords

Moon; Regoliths; Radar observations; Calibration; Chang'E-5 mission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Lunar Regolith Penetrating Radar (LRPR) on the Chang'E 5 lander is the first antenna-array radar deployed for the exploration of extraterrestrial objects. It can measure the subsurface structure of the moon with a resolution of about 10 cm. This study presents a cable delay calibration method and an imaging method based on radio astronomy to visualize the subsurface structure of the Chang'E-5 landing site. The radar images derived from LRPR observations show consistency and match the drilling process record.
The Lunar Regolith Penetrating Radar (LRPR) onboard the Chang'E 5 lander is the first antenna-array radar deployed for the exploration of an extraterrestrial object. It is able to measure the subsurface structure of the moon at a resolution of similar to 10 cm. This work presents a method for calibrating the variable cable delay of the LRPR and an imaging method based on synthesis imaging from Radio Astronomy. The cable delay calibration method effectively calibrates the cable delay shift of the LRPR with a nanosecond-level precision. To validate the accuracy of the cable delay method, we use the data obtained from both the ground experiment and the moon-exploration mission of the LRPR. The imaging method is used to visualize the subsurface structure of the Chang'E-5 (CE-5) landing site. Moreover, Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) simulation is carried out to help interpret the imaging results. The radar images derived from the LRPR observations show consistency with each other and match the bit force record during the drilling process. The results suggest that the rocks interacted with the CE-5 drill feature a size of 15 to 20 cm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available