Variable choice affects estimations of vulnerability to climate change

For practical reasons, assessments of species' vulnerability to rising temperatures are often limited to measuring responses to a single ecological response variable, but this could result in an underestimation of vulnerability. Using the Cape Rockjumper Chaetops frenatus ('Rockjumper') we examined the thermal risk to nestling Rockjumpers for sublethal (i.e. reduced nestling mass gain) and lethal (i.e. increased nest predation) consequences of sustained hot weather under both current and predicted future climatic conditions (RCP 8.5). We used a direct approach to examine these risks, first as independent ecological responses and then as combined risk driven by both response variables (mass gain and predation risk). This study revealed that the inclusion of multiple climate-related responses affected the predicted vulnerability to climate change. Further, our analyses showed that increased vulnerability to climate change will vary within the Rockjumper's habitat. Our results demonstrate that the variability in predicted thermal risk depends on which response variable was used, with implications for how and where conservation practitioners direct their already limited resources.

Automated summary

Assessments of species' vulnerability to rising temperatures often underestimate the risks when only measuring responses to a single ecological variable. A study on the Cape Rockjumper revealed that including multiple climate-related responses affected the predicted vulnerability to climate change and showed variability within the species' habitat. These findings highlight the importance of considering multiple risks and implications for conservation strategies.