4.1 Article

Regional differences in clinical characteristics and fetal and maternal outcomes of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in China: a retrospective study

Journal

HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10641955.2023.2234490

Keywords

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy; preeclampsia; perinatal care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study describes the variations in manifestations and outcomes of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDPs) among different regions in China. It suggests that region-specific perinatal management guidelines should be developed to improve perinatal health care and reduce the incidence of HDP.
BackgroundHypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDPs) are the leading causes of maternal and perinatal death worldwide, and appropriate prenatal care is beneficial toward improve pregnancy outcomes in populations at high risk of preeclampsia.ObjectiveTo describe variations in regional manifestations and outcomes of HDPs among the Chinese population to aid in the development of region-specific perinatal management guidelines.MethodsThis is a retrospective study. The clinical data of patients with HDP in 3 different regions were collected to explore the characteristics of HDP patients in different regions of China.ResultsIn Peking University First Hospital, a regional rescue center for prenatal care and delivery, the proportion of patients with high-risk factors for PE was considerably high; 37.8% were of advanced maternal age, and 14.7% were obese. Among the patients, at this hospital, the proportion of comorbidities (e.g., chronic hypertension) in HDP patients was higher than that in the other 2 specialized maternal and child health care hospitals.ConclusionTargeted prenatal care procedures should be established based on regional characteristics to improve the quality of perinatal health care and reduce the incidence of HDP. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available