Effect of preoperative cervical conization before hysterectomy on survival and recurrence of patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective. Conization plays a therapeutic and diagnostic role in cervical cancer. We conducted a systematic re-view and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with cervical cancer who underwent hys-terectomy with versus without preoperative cervical conization.Methods. In this meta-analysis, we analyzed studies published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Clinical Trials. gov that appeared in our search from inception to May 1, 2022.Results. Eleven studies with 4184 participants were included in this review. There were 2122 patients in the preoperative conization group and 2062 patients in the non-conization group. The meta-analysis showed that disease free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.12-0.44; 1616 participants; P = 0.030) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33-0.86; 1835 participants; P = 0.597) were improved in the preoperative conization group compared with those in the non-conization group. The risk for recurrence was lower in the pre -operative conization group than in the non-conization group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17-0.48; 1099 par-ticipants; P = 0.434). There was no significant statistical difference regarding intraoperative adverse events (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.18-3.70; 530 participants; P = 0.555) and postoperative adverse events (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.54-2.85; 530 participants; P = 0.170) between the preoperative conization group and non-conization group. In subgroup analysis, patients who benefited more from preoperative conization, had underwent minimally invasive surgery, had smaller local tumor lesions, and had no lymph node involvement.Conclusions. Preoperative conization before radical hysterectomy may have a protective effect in the treat-ment of early cervical cancer, with better survival and less recurrence, especially when the patient is at an early stage and undergoes minimally invasive surgery.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy with or without preoperative cervical conization. The analysis included 11 studies with 4184 participants and showed that preoperative conization improved disease-free survival and overall survival, with a lower risk of recurrence. Especially for early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery, had smaller tumor size, and no lymph node involvement, preoperative conization may have a better therapeutic effect.