4.7 Review

Analyzing research trends of universities' carbon footprint: An integrated review

Journal

GONDWANA RESEARCH
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 259-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2023.05.008

Keywords

Carbon footprint; Environmental sustainability; University campus; Literature review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An accurate assessment of carbon footprint is essential for evaluating progress towards sustainable development. This study focuses on universities' carbon footprint and provides a detailed review of the topic, including thematic analysis, cocitation analysis, research collaboration analysis, and methodological and topical contribution. The findings contribute to policymakers' understanding of academic institutions' carbon footprint and offer policy suggestions for improvement.
An accurate assessment of carbon footprint is one of the key elements to evaluate progress towards sustainable development. Although, recent studies have extensively analyzed carbon footprint, the scientific contribution related to universities and higher education institutes requires further consideration. The current study provides a detailed integrative review of universities' carbon footprint to provide contextual information and novel findings. Our novel review strategy allows us to report thematic analysis, cocitation analysis, research collaboration analysis, and methodological and topical contribution. As policymakers prioritize sustainable development, we allow them to understand different dynamics of academic institutions' carbon footprint and report policy suggestions to improve it. As any change at higher research institutions has a wider impact on society in general, it is our opinion that developing sustainable university campuses also has implications for future research, management practices and compliance with sustainable development goals. (c) 2023 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available