Reactive postural adjustment in response to predictable and unpredictable perturbations in healthy adults: A comparison between swayback, hyperlordotic and erect postures

Background: Promoting an erect posture in standing has been advocated to offer superior protection to the spine when compared to hyperlordotic and swayback postures.Research question: Do postural adjustments towards external perturbation differ between erect, hyperlordotic and swayback postures? If so, which posture offers better protection to lumbar spine?Methods: Forty-four healthy adults received top-down perturbations under unpredictable (without visual-and-auditory input) and predictable (with visual-and-auditory input) conditions in three simulated postures: erect, hyperlordotic, and swayback. Postural adjustments namely the centre of pressure parameters, joint angle onsets, and neuromuscular responses measured by muscle onsets and co-contraction between muscle pairs upon the perturbation were compared using the two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction was conducted to identify the between-posture differences for the respective postural adjustment parameters.Results: Path length, ellipse area and average velocity of centre of pressure were significantly greater under unpredictable condition as compared to predictable condition (p < 0.001). Significant between-posture difference was detected in centre of pressure path length (p < 0.035), pelvic tilt onset (p < 0.038) and all muscle co-contraction indexes (p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis revealed significantly smaller centre of pressure path length in erect posture as compared to hyperlordotic and swayback postures (p < 0.01) under unpredictable conditions. Significantly greater co-contraction indexes of lumbar multifidus and erector spinae, and internal oblique and lumbar multifidus were found in hyperlordotic as compared to erect and swayback postures (p < 0.05).Significance: Compared to erect posture, adoption of hyperlordotic and swayback postures altered the contributions of the active and passive subsystems of the spine that regulates postural control upon external perturbations. Such differences in neuromuscular control may lessen the capacity of the human spine to withstand loading and shear forces. Prospective studies are required to validate if habitually adopted hyperlordotic and swayback postures contribute to an earlier/ higher prevalence of spinal dysfunctions.

Automated summary

This study examined the differences in postural adjustments between erect, hyperlordotic, and swayback postures when facing external perturbations. The findings suggest that adopting hyperlordotic and swayback postures alters the contributions of the active and passive subsystems of the spine in postural control, potentially reducing the spine's ability to withstand loading and shear forces.