4.5 Article

Construction of hot helium leak test facility for ITER blanket shield block

Journal

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113789

Keywords

Blanket shield block; Factory acceptance test; Hot helium leak test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ITER Blanket Shield Block (SB) is a key in-vessel component responsible for nuclear shielding and heat removal in the ITER project. To ensure the integrity of welded joints and prevent leakage during manufacturing and testing, two Hot Helium Leak Test (HHLT) facilities have been constructed and commissioned by the ITER Korea Domestic Agency (KODA). This paper presents the design features and lessons learned from the HHLT facilities.
The ITER Blanket Shield Block (SB) is one of the main in-vessel components that provides nuclear shielding and removes nuclear heating for the Vacuum Vessel (VV) and external vessel components. The SB, which contains internal cooling channels, is manufactured from 316L(N)-IG stainless steel, and the internal channels are designed to provide the required thermal-hydraulic performance while aiming for a water/steel ratio that results in good nuclear shielding with headers and welded cover plates. Therefore, the soundness of all SB products' welded joints must be confirmed to eliminate the risk of leakage during manufacturing and the Factory Acceptance Test (FAT). However, a test facility capable of testing large components at high temperatures has never been constructed anywhere. The ITER Korea Domestic Agency (KODA) has therefore successfully completed the construction and commissioning of two Hot Helium Leak Test (HHLT) facilities, and all SB series products are being entirely tested under RT and an elevated temperature of 250 degrees C with a maximum operational pressure of 5.0 MPa. This paper provides information on the design features of the two HHLT facilities and lessons learned from the commissioning test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available