Journal
FUEL
Volume 347, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128425
Keywords
Underground coal gasification; Moving injection; Cavity evolution; Gas production performance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Underground coal gasification (UCG) is optimized using the controlled retreating injection point (CRIP) method, but previous studies only focused on gasification behavior under fixed time intervals. This study examines gas production and reaction region evolution for UCG with continuously moving injection in different directions and speeds. Moving backward injection at a uniform speed results in unsatisfactory gas production, while backward injection at regular intervals with fixed distances optimizes gas production. Moving forward injection with matched speed and oxygen flow achieves stable gas production with high heating value. Different methods are recommended for different types of coal to overcome specific challenges.
Underground coal gasification (UCG) is an in-situ gasification technology where the controlled retreating injection point (CRIP) method is usually adopted to optimize the cavity evolution and gas production stability. However, the reported studies only focus on the gasification behavior of the moving injection backward under fixed time intervals. In this work, the gas production performance and reaction region evolution were studied for UCG with continuously moving injection for different directions and different speeds. For moving backward injection, when a uniform moving speed is used, gas production is not satisfactory with a heating value of 1 MJ/ m3. In order to optimize the gas production, the injection should move backward for a fixed distance at regular time intervals rather than continuously, and the distance should be long enough for a new distribution of combustion zone, gasification zone and pyrolysis zone. For moving forward injection, when the moving speed and oxygen flow rate match well, the maximum heating value is larger than 11 MJ/m3, and the gas production is stable. The moving forward method is recommended for low ash coal to avoid ash cover pipe problem, and the injection pipe should be manufactured with high temperature resistant material. The moving backward method is recommended for low volatile coal to avoid gas product leakage problem, and the retreatment distance should be specially designed to avoid re-ignition.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available