4.7 Article

Experimental and kinetic modeling study on the oxidation and laminar combustion characteristics of natural gas

Journal

FUEL
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128019

Keywords

Oxidation characteristics; Laminar combustion characteristics; Natural gas; Reduced reaction mechanism; Path sensitivity analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the oxidation and combustion processes of natural gas were experimentally tested and analyzed. A reduced reaction mechanism was developed and validated, which can accurately predict the oxidation, ignition delay, and laminar combustion characteristics of natural gas under various conditions.
The oxidation process in the flow tube reactor and the laminar combustion process in the constant volume combustion bomb of natural gas (0.9 methane/0.07 ethane/0.03 propane, mole fraction) were experimental tested. Furthermore, a reduced reaction mechanism (including 40 species and 189 reactions) of natural gas was developed based on the Aramco 2.0 mechanism by combining the path sensitivity analysis, rate of production analysis, reaction path analysis and the decoupling method. The results show that, in the oxidation process of natural gas, with the equivalence ratio increasing, the starting and ending temperatures for oxidation reaction of natural gas are increased, the reaction temperatures corresponding to CO generation and consumption are higher, and the amount of NO production is decreased. In the the laminar combustion process of natural gas, with the initial temperature and oxygen content increasing or the initial pressure, CO2 and H2O contents decreasing, the laminar flame speed is increased. Through comparing with the calculated results by the Aramco 2.0 mechanism and the corresponding test data, the reduced reaction mechanism can well predict the oxidation, ignition delay and laminar combustion characteristics of natural gas under various conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available