4.7 Article

Liquified hydrogen vs. liquified renewable methane: Evaluating energy consumption and infrastructure for sustainable fuels

Journal

FUEL
Volume 350, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128779

Keywords

Boil -off gas; Carbon capture; Clean energy; Energy carrier; Liquefaction; Synthetic natural gas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to assess the energy consumption characteristics of various fuels, including liquified natural gas, liquefied renewable methane, and liquefied hydrogen, from production to overseas transportation, covering a wide range of color spectra. The study uses quantitative and qualitative assessments to determine the energy consumption and to compare the use of fuels from different perspectives. The results show the energy consumption of each fuel and the readiness of infrastructure and regulations for their use.
This study aims to assess the energy consumption characteristics of various fuels, namely liquified natural gas, liquefied renewable methane, and liquefied hydrogen from production to overseas transportation, by covering broad color spectra of grey, blue, and green. A quantitative assessment is implemented to calculate how much energy is consumed to produce, store, and transport fuels. Carbon capture scenarios are also considered, along with boil-off gas recovery and utilization options for increased value chain effectiveness. Thereafter, a qualitative assessment is performed to compare the use of fuels from four perspectives: (i) technology, (ii) infrastructure, (iii) scalability, and (iv) regulations. The obtained quantitative results indicate that the energy consumption to produce liquified natural gas, liquefied renewable methane, and liquefied green hydrogen is about 0.49, 31.4, and 62.3 kWhe/kg of fuel, respectively. The energy consumption to store liquified hydrogen in a 2,000 m3 onland storage tank for one day while recovering 100% of the generated boil-off gas is about 4,840 kWh. Moreover, the qualitative results indicate that the infrastructure is ready, and regulations are available to use liquefied renewable methane as fuel, whereas the infrastructure of liquified hydrogen still needs to be ready, and the associated regulations require amendments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available