4.7 Article

Identification and detection of protein-derived adulterants in oyster peptide powder through an untargeted and targeted proteomics workflow

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109896

Keywords

Oyster; Peptide powder; Adulteration; Signature peptide; MRM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to detect protein-derived adulterants in oyster peptide powder qualitatively and quantitatively using untargeted and targeted proteomics strategies. Various peptides derived from non-oyster proteins were detected, and three signature peptides of gelatin-derived adulterants were identified and confirmed. An MRM-based quantitative method was established, which showed good linearity and recovery, contributing to the quality control of food-derived peptides in oyster peptide powder products.
Oyster peptides are one of the main deep-processing commercial products of oysters, which are generally circulated in the form of peptide powder to preserve and extend the shelf life. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively detect protein-derived adulterants in oyster peptide powder through a combination of untargeted and targeted proteomics strategies. Various peptides derived from non-oyster proteins, mainly collagens of fish, porcine, chicken, and bovine, were detected in the adulterated samples through untargeted proteomics technology. Three signature peptides of gelatin-derived adulterants, namely GPPGKPGP, SGPAGPR, and GPPGPAGPA, were identified and confirmed. On this basis, an MRM-based quantitative method was established using the three signature peptides, which showed good linear relationships with correlation coefficients greater than 0.99 and recovery ranging from 98% to 127%. The established method could quantify the adulteration detection of protein-derived adulterants in oyster peptide powder products, contributing to the quality control of food-derived peptides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available