4.6 Article

Optical coherence tomographic findings of glaucomatous eyes with papillomacular retinoschisis

Journal

EYE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02671-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the shape of the optic nerve head margin detected by OCT and the clinical characteristics of glaucomatous eyes with papillomacular retinoschisis (PMRS). The study found significant differences in the clinical features between eyes with externally oblique ONH margin and internally oblique ONH margin. The mechanism of PMRS development may differ in these two groups.
ObjectivesTo investigate the relationship between the shape of the optic nerve head (ONH) margin detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the clinical characteristics of glaucomatous eyes with papillomacular retinoschisis (PMRS).MethodsThe medical record of patients with a PMRS in a glaucomatous eye were reviewed. The eyes were placed into two groups determined by the shape of the ONH margin in the OCT images; eyes with an externally oblique ONH margin (Group 1) and eyes with an internally oblique ONH margin (Group 2). We compared the clinical characteristics of the PMRS of these two groups.ResultsWe studied 31 eyes of 29 patients with PMRS and glaucoma with 24 eyes in Group 1 and 7 eyes in Group 2. The optic nerve fibre layer schisis on the lamina cribrosa (LC), beta zone, and gamma zone, and found that the LC defects were detected significantly more frequently in Group 1 than in Group 2 eyes (P < 0.05). A retinal nerve fibre schisis was observed around the ONH significantly more frequently in Group 2 than in Group 1 eyes (P < 0.01).ConclusionThe cases of glaucoma-associated PMRS could be classified into two groups according to the obliquity of the ONH. They had differences in the findings of OCT and FA. The possibility that the mechanism of PMRS development is different in both groups is suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available