4.5 Article

External quality assessment of orthohantavirus and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus molecular detection and serology in Europe, 2021

Journal

EUROSURVEILLANCE
Volume 28, Issue 40, Pages -

Publisher

EUR CENTRE DIS PREVENTION & CONTROL
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.40.2300054

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic capability of European expert laboratories in detecting orthohantaviruses, LCMV, and human antibody response. The results showed a high accuracy in serological diagnosis but a need for improvement in molecular detection. Regular quality assessments were recommended.
Background: Rodent-borne viruses such as orthohan-taviruses and arenaviruses cause considerable dis-ease burden with regional and temporal differences in incidence and clinical awareness. Therefore, it is important to regularly evaluate laboratory diagnos-tic capabilities, e.g. by external quality assessments (EQA). Aim: We wished to evaluate the performance and diagnostic capability of European expert labora-tories to detect orthohantaviruses and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and human antibody response towards orthohantaviruses. Methods: We conducted an EQA in 2021; molecular panels consisted of 12 samples, including different orthohantaviruses (Seoul, Dobrava-Belgrade (DOBV), Puumala (PUUV) and Hantaan orthohantavirus), LCMV and negative controls. Serological panels consisted of six human serum samples reactive to PUUV, DOBV or negative to orthohantaviruses. The EQA was sent to 25 laborato-ries in 20 countries. Results: The accuracy of molecu-lar detection of orthohantaviruses varied (50-67%, average 62%) among 16 participating laboratories, while LCMV samples were successfully detected in all 11 participating laboratories (91-100%, average 96%). The accuracy of serological diagnosis of acute and past orthohantavirus infections was on average 95% among 20 participating laboratories and 82% in 19 laboratories, respectively. A variety of methods was used, with predominance of in-house assays for molecular tests, and commercial assays for serological ones. Conclusion: Serology, the most common tool to diagnose acute orthohantavirus infections, had a high accuracy in this EQA. The molecular detection of orthohantaviruses needs improvement while LCMV detection (performed in fewer laboratories) had 95% accuracy. Further EQAs are recommended to be per-formed periodically to monitor improvements and challenges in the diagnostics of rodent-borne diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available