4.5 Article

Causes and consequences of delayed diagnosis in breast cancer screening with a focus on mammographic features and tumour characteristics

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111048

Keywords

Diagnostic delay; Breast cancer; Screening programme; Tumour characteristics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, causes, and consequences of delayed breast cancer diagnosis in the screening population. The results showed that a primary diagnostic delay in breast cancer diagnosis resulted in less favorable tumor characteristics and a higher rate of mastectomy compared to no delay in diagnosis and a delay in diagnostic work-up after recall.
Purpose: To study the prevalence, causes and consequences of delayed breast cancer diagnosis in the screening population. Methods: This retrospective study was performed in women who underwent biennial screening mammography between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2019. Patients were divided into 3 groups; screen-detected breast cancer (SDC) without a diagnostic delay, a primary diagnostic delay (i.e. missed cancer at previous screening round) and a delay in diagnostic work-up after recall. Women with a true interval cancer (IC; i.e. not visible on prior examinations) were excluded. Outcome parameters included mammographic and tumour characteristics, lymph node status and surgical treatment. Results: In our sample of 4491 women with breast cancer (4292 SDC and 199 'missed' IC), respectively, a total of 1112 women experienced a diagnostic delay of >= 4 months. Compared to women without a diagnostic delay (n = 2720), the 176 women with a delay in diagnostic work-up showed overall similar mammographic abnormalities (P = 0.052). These groups show similar distributions in invasive tumours, tumour stage and lymph node status (P = 0.25, P = 0.95 and P = 0.93, respectively). Women with a primary diagnostic delay (n = 936) showed less calcifications (P < 0.001), and more masses with calcifications and architectural distortions on mammography (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). Moreover, this group comprised larger tumours (P < 0.001) and lymph node metastases (P < 0.001), and more often underwent mastectomy (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A primary diagnostic delay in breast cancer diagnosis results in less favourable tumour characteristics and relatively more mastectomies compared to no delay in breast cancer diagnosis and a delay in diagnostic work-up after recall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available