4.7 Article

Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy: An illustrative case of a newly introduced disease

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 3397-3399

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15997

Keywords

amyloid; CAA; cerebral amyloid angiopathy; cerebral haemorrhage; PET; prion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy (iCAA) is a specific type of cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and its diagnosis is increasing. It is hypothesized that iCAA may occur as a late consequence of past neurosurgical interventions involving dural patch grafts. Although positron emission tomography (PET) scans and beta-amyloid levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are auxiliary criteria, the definite diagnosis still relies on histopathological examination.
Background and purpose: Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy (iCAA) is a specific type of cerebral amyloid angiopathy which is becoming increasingly diagnosed. It has been hypothesized that iCAA might arise as a late consequence of past neurosurgical interventions involving dural patch grafts. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans with amyloid tracers and the assay of beta-amyloid levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are auxiliary criteria, however, definite diagnosis remains histopathologically determined.MethodsCase report.Results: We present a 48-year-old patient who suffered multiple lobar cerebral haemorrhages from the age of 47. The patient had undergone surgery for remolval of hemangioblastoma with lyophilized dural graft at the age of 11, in 1987. Brain MRI, amiloid PET and CSF analysis led to a diagnosis of probable iCAA.Conclusion: It is necessary to increase the awareness of iCAA, in order to avoid overlooking the potential causal involvement of surgical procedures which took place far back in time. Moreover, the diagnostic relevance of amyloid PET and beta-amyloid levels in CSF must be emphasised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available